Page 17 - Delaware Medical Journal - December 2015
P. 17
Although the amount of radiation in extremity scans in this study
Considering the heightened risks of radiation exposure in the pediatric population, attempts should still be made to minimize the number of scans and the total radiation dose in extremity imaging. As the degree of radiation exposure in various imaging analysis can occur with individual studies. For example, lower extremity CT scans demonstrated higher radiation exposures in of individual studies is an important goal of future study.
As more data emerge about the impact of high radiation doses in children, additional strategies for reducing radiation must be developed. In our experience, many pediatric patients in the community undergo advanced imaging studies unnecessarily. Developing algorithms and guidelines for appropriate use of may help to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure in this
population. Additionally, continuing protocol improvements and technological advancements in CT machines are important strategies that will clearly play a role. As low-risk imaging modalities such as MRI and ultrasound continue to improve,
CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS
■ MICHAEL KERN, MD was a Pediatric Orthopedic Resident at Nemours/ Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Del.
■ ASHLEY TUCKER, PA-C is a Physician Assistant at the Nemours Orthopedic Center at Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Del.
■ KENNETH ROGERS, PHD, ATC is the Program Manager for Research and Sports Medicine on the Sports Medicine Team at Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Del.
■ RICHARD W. KRUSE, MBA, DO is the Division Chief of the Orthopedic Trauma Program and Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon at Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children in Wilmington, Del.
REFERENCES
1. Image Gently. The Aliiance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. Available at: http://www.imagegently.org/. Accessed September 16, 2014.
2. Radiation Risks and Pediatric Computed Tomography (CT): A Guide for Health Care Providers. National Cancer Institute, 06 June 2012. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/. Accessed September 16, 2014.
3. Pierce DA, Shimizu Y, Preston DL, Vaeth M, Mabuchi K. Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. report 12, part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. 1996. Radiat Res. 2012;178:AV61-AV87.
4. Brenner DJ. Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative. Pediatr Radiol. 2002;32:228-221.
5. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics. 2003;112:951-957.
6. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, et al.
The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program.
Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38:265-269.
7. The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable)
concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18-19, 2001. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:217-313.
8. Slovis TL. Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics. 2003;112:971-972.
9. Ware DE, Huda W, Mergo PJ, Litwiller AL. Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology. 1999;210:645-650.
10. Sharp NE, Svetanoff WJ, Desai A, et al. Radiation exposure from head computed tomography scans in pediatric trauma.
J Surg Res. 2014;192:276–279.
11. Paterson A, Frush DP, Donnelly LF. Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:297-301.
12. Li B, Behrman RH. Comment on the
“report of AAPM TG 204: size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult
body CT examinations” [report of AAPM TG 204, 2011]. Med Phys. 2012;39:4613-4614.
13. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography
– an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–2284.
14. Brady SL, Kaufman RA. Investigation of American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 size-specific dose estimates for pediatric CT implementation. Radiology. 2012;265:832-840.
15. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT Examinations: report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park, MD: American Association of Physicists in Medicine; 2011.
16. Sharp NE, Raghavan MU, Svetanoff WJ, et al. Radiation exposure – how do CT scans for appendicitis compare between a free standing children’s hospital and non- dedicated pediatric facilities? J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:1016-1019.
Del Med J | December 2015 | Vol. 87 | No. 12
369
