Page 20 - Delaware Medical Journal - November 2016
P. 20
possible that other outcomes, such as frontal plane biomechanics of the trunk and pelvis may be affected by the weaker hip abductor muscles and additional research is warranted to
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was funded by a grant from the University of Delaware Research Foundation and from Comprehensive Opportunities
in Rehabilitation Research Training Grant K12 HD055931. The authors would like to acknowledge the orthopaedic surgeons who contributed the patient recruitment during this study, including Dr. Alex Bodenstab, Dr. Steven Dellose, and Dr. Leo Raisis.
REFERENCES
1. Vissers MM, Bussmann JB, Verhaar J a N, Arends LR, Furlan
AD, Reijman M. Recovery of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Phys Ther. 2011;91:615-629.
2. Post ZD, Orozco FM, Diaz-Ledesma CM, Hozack WJ, Ong, AM. Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Indications, Technique, and Results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:595-603.
3. Jones RW. Fractures of the Neck of the Femur. Br Med J. 1934;2:1220.
4. Foster DE, Hunter JR. The direct lateral approach to the hip for arthroplasty. Advantages and Complicatoins. Orthopedics. 1987;10:274-280.
5. Gibson A. Posterior exposure of the hip joint. J Bone Jt Surg. 1950;32B:183-186.
6. Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133:1595-1600.
7. Petis S, Howard J, Lanting B, Vasarhelyi E. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg. 2015;58:128-139.
8. Krautwurst BK, Wolf SI, Heitzmann DWW, Gantz S, Braatz F, Dreher T. The influence of hip abductor weakness on frontal plane motion of the trunk and pelvis in patients with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:1198-1203.
9. Madsen MS, Ritter MA, Morris HH, et al. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:44-50.
10. Alnahdi AH, Zeni JA, Snyder-Mackler L. Hip abductor strength reliability and association with phsycial function after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2014;9:1154-1162.
11. Zeni J, Abujaber S, Pozzi F, Raisis L. Relationship between strength, pain, and different measures of functional ability in patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2014;66:1506-1512.
We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Brian Galinat and the Department of Orthopaedics at Christiana Care Health Systems for their continued support of collaborative research efforts.
■ JOSEPH ZENI JR., PT, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the University of Delaware Physical Therapy Department.
■ KATHLEEN MADARA, PT, DPT is a third year PhD student in the University of Delaware Biomechanics and Movement Science Program
■ JAMES RUBANO, MD is an Orthopaedic Surgeon with Delaware Orthopaedic Specialists. He performs joint replacement surgery at Christiana Care’s Center for Advanced Joint Replacement.
12. Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2008;24:676-682.
13. Martin RL, Kelly BT, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:1304-1311.
14. Martin RL, Philippon MJ. Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc - J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2007;23:822-826.
15. Kennedy DM, Stratford PW, Wessel J, Gollish JD, Penney D. Assessing stability and change of four performance measures: a longitudinal study evaluating outcome following total hip and knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2005;6:3.
16. Gore D, Murray M, Sepic S, Gardner G. Anterolateral compared to posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: differences in component positioning, hip strength, and hip motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982:180-187.
17. Kiyama T, Naito M, Shinoda T, Maeyama A. Hip abductor strengths after total hip arthroplasty via the lateral and posterolateral approaches. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:76-80.
CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Yamaguchi T, Naito M, Asayama I, Ishiko T. Total hip arthroplasty: the relationship between posterolateral reconstruction,
abductor muscle strength, and femoral offset. J Orthop Surg. 2001;12(2):164-167.
McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect
of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:865-869.
Mahmood SS, Mukka SS, Crnalic S, Wretenberg P, Sayed-Noor AS. Association between changes in global femoral offset after total hip arthroplasty and function, quality of life, and abductor muscle strength. Acta Orthop. 2015;3674:1-6.
Rathod P, Fukunaga T, Deshmukh A, Ranawat A, Rodriguez J. Hip strength recovery with direct anterior and posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are there any differences? Bone Jt. 2013;95-B:312.
Häkkinen A, Borg H, Kautiainen H, et al. Muscle strength and range of movement deficits 1 year after hip resurfacing surgery using posterior approach. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:483-491.
340
Del Med J | November 2016 | Vol. 88 | No. 11

